Toward a New Maritime Strategy

The book examines the evolution of American naval thinking in the post-Cold War era. It recounts the development of the U.S. Navys key strategic documents from the fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989 to the release in 2007 of the U.S. Navys maritime strategy, A Cooperative Strategy for 21st Century Seapower. An insightful and penetrating intellectual history, it critically analyzes the Navys way of thinking and ideas, and recounts how they interacted with those that govern U.S. strategy to shape the course of U.S. naval strategy in the post-Cold War era.The book explains how the Navy arrived at its current strategic outlook and why it took nearly two decades for the Navy to develop a maritime strategy in an era in which the relative saliency of such should have been more apparent to Navy leaders. The author, a Navy captain, doesnt shy from taking to task the institution and its leaders for their narrow worldview and failure to understand the virtues and contributions of American sea power, particularly in an era of globalization.It describes the reasons behind the Navys late development of a maritime strategy during the post-Cold War era. It recounts the origins and evolution of the Navys distinctive way of thinking and ideas about sea power since before the Second World War, particularly how they shaped and were shaped by the Navys Cold War experiences.It argues that the Navys way of thinking and ideas, and how they interacted those that governed U.S. strategy, bounded and channeled U.S. naval strategy away from a maritime approach as they had during the Cold War. It took an implausible series of events for one to emerge, including a losing war in Iraqthat called into question long-standing assumptions about U.S. strategy, threatened the Navys relevance, and brought about a systemically oriented U.S. strategic approachand the appearance of two maritime-minded Navy leaders.It focuses on the process by which the Navy developed its strategic documents, the process where institutional ideas are assembled, negotiated, and reshaped in light of other influencesi.e., the direction of U.S. strategy, budgetary constraints, perceived threats, and the competing interests of other domestic and institutional actorsbecause even though the subject is American naval thinking (and here it must be emphasized that the concept itself is somewhat metaphorical as only people can think), that is how real strategy is made.