Spedizione gratuita per ordini superiori a 69,99 euro.

Controllare lo stato dell'ordine

Entra a far parte di una comunità di amanti dei libri di tutto il mondo e ottieni numerosi vantaggi. Crea un account gratuito

Spedizione gratuita con Packeta per un prezzo superiore a 69.99 €

Bartolini 4.49 € Punto Poste 5.49 € Punto Poste 5.49 € Punto Bartolini 3.49 € DHL 6.99 € GLS 5.99 €

Contatto

Come acquistare

Aiuto

Il mio account

▸ Vuoto :-(

Spedizione gratuita per ordini superiori a 69,99 euro.

Loss Given Default Modeling: a Comparative Analysis

Name: Loss Given Default Modeling: a Comparative Analysis
Brand: LAP Lambert Academic Publishing
SKU: 18715689
Price: 27.09 EUR
Availability: InStock
Author: Olga Yashkir
ISBN: 9786202093750

Olga Yashkir

Yuri Yashkir

Lingua

Inglese

Libro In brossura

Codice Libristo: 18715689

Casa editrice LAP Lambert Academic Publishing, novembre 2016

Several most popular Loss Given Default (LGD) models were investigated (LSM, Tobit, Three-Tiered Tob... Descrizione completa

Codice Libristo: 18715689

66 b

27.09 €

Magazzino esterno Inviamo tra 5-8 giorni

30 giorni per il reso

I clienti hanno acquistato anche

Charite sacerdotale, ou Lecons elementaires de theologie pastorale. Tome 2 DESURMONT-A

In brossura

36.39 €

Les droits sexuels ou la destruction programmée de l’enfance et de la famille Sigaut

In brossura

27.29 €

Die Sünde aber gebiert den Tod Andrea Schacht

In brossura

9.59 €

Carte des Vignobles et Vins de France - Affiche 50x70cm

binding.

31.89 €

leben // gestalten Ulf Kilian

Rigido

23.69 €

Several most popular Loss Given Default (LGD) models were investigated (LSM, Tobit, Three-Tiered Tobit, Beta Regression, Inflated Beta Regression, Censored Gamma Regression) in order to compare their performance. We show that for a given input data set, the quality of the model calibration depends mainly on the proper choice of explanatory variables, but not on the fitting model. Model factors were chosen based on their correlation with historical LGDs of the calibration data set. Numerical values of non-quantitative parameters (industry, ranking, type of collateral) were introduced as their LGD average. We show that different debt instruments depend on different sets of model factors (from three factors for Revolving Credit or for Subordinated Bonds to eight factors for Senior Secured Bonds). Calibration of LGD models using distressed business cycle periods provide better fit than data from total available time span. Calibration algorithms and details of their realization using the R statistical package are presented. We demonstrate how LGD models can be used for stress testing. The results of this study can be of use to risk managers concerned with the Basel accord compliance.